The True Hidden Costs of Equipment Ownership: What Contractors Need to Know in 2024 - EquipmentWatch

The True Hidden Costs of Equipment Ownership: What Contractors Need to Know in 2024

In today’s construction industry, where every dollar counts, contractors must make strategic decisions about their equipment investments. With so many uncertainties left in this year, including potential slowdowns in construction activity, understanding the true costs of owning equipment versus renting has never been more critical. This article aims to delve into the often-overlooked expenses associated with equipment ownership, offering a comprehensive analysis that compares the financial implications of owning versus renting. 

The Resale Value Dilemma

One of the most significant hidden costs of equipment ownership is depreciation, a factor that can severely affect the resale value of your machinery. According to the American Rental Association, the rental market saw substantial growth in 2023, prompting many contractors to reevaluate whether buying equipment is truly worth the investment.¹ While owning equipment offers certain conveniences, it also comes with the challenge of managing its resale value over time. 

Depreciation and Resale Value

When you buy equipment, you are at once exposed to depreciation. For instance, construction equipment often loses 20-30% of its value within the first year of use. By the time you decide to sell or trade in the machinery, its value may have depreciated significantly. This is particularly true for specialized equipment that sees limited use. If you haven’t reassessed your equipment’s value recently, you might be surprised by how much it has depreciated—potentially leaving you with a lower-than-expected return when you sell. 

Example:

Consider a bulldozer bought for $500,000. After one year, its value might drop to $400,000—a loss of $100,000 in just 12 months. Over the next few years, the value will continue to decline, making it critical to regularly evaluate your equipment’s resale potential. Tools like EquipmentWatch’s Desktop Valuation can provide up-to-date assessments to help you stay informed.

gettyimages-888826400

The Cost of Falling Behind on Maintenance

Another hidden cost of ownership is the ongoing expense of maintenance and repairs. While routine maintenance is essential to keeping your equipment in good working order, unexpected breakdowns can quickly add up. The cost of unplanned repairs can be significant, especially if they involve expensive components or specialized labor. In fact, a report by the Construction Industry Institute found that maintenance costs can account for as much as 15-20% of the total cost of owning equipment.²

Impact on Project Timelines

Equipment breakdowns don’t just affect your bottom line; they can also disrupt project timelines. Delays caused by equipment failure can lead to penalties, strained client relationships, and lost revenue. Contractors who own their equipment must account for these potential disruptions when calculating the true cost of ownership. 

The Hidden Costs of Equipment Idle Time

Idle time is another often-overlooked factor that can significantly affect the cost of ownership. Equipment that sits idle on a job site still incurs costs, such as depreciation, insurance, and storage fees, even though it’s not generating any revenue. 

Idle time costs can be calculated by multiplying the hourly ownership rate by the number of idle hours. For example, a backhoe that costs $50 per hour to own and sits idle for 20 hours a week incurs an added $1,000 per month in hidden costs. Over a year, that’s $12,000 in lost value. 

One way to reduce idle time is by sharing equipment across multiple projects or renting out unused equipment. However, coordinating these efforts requires careful planning and management. Contractors should also consider whether renting equipment on an as-needed basis might be more cost-effective, particularly for specialized machinery that sees limited use. 

Comparing Ownership to Renting: The Financial Implications

When it comes to buying equipment, contractors must decide between purchasing and renting. Each choice has its advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice often depends on the specific needs of the project and the financial goals of the business.

Ownership 

PROS: 

  • Full control over the equipment.
  • Ability to customize and modify machinery.
  • Potential for tax benefits, such as depreciation deductions. 

CONS: 

  • High upfront costs and ongoing expenses (maintenance, insurance, storage).
  • Depreciation reduces the equipment’s resale value over time.
  • Risk of equipment becoming obsolete or underutilized. 

Renting

PROS: 

  • Lower upfront costs, freeing up capital for other investments. 
  • Access to the latest models and technology. 
  • No need to worry about maintenance, repairs, or depreciation. 
  • Flexibility to scale equipment needs up or down depending on project demands. 

CONS: 

  • No equity built in the equipment. 
  • Rental costs can add up over time, potentially exceeding the cost of ownership if the equipment is needed often. 
  • Limited control over availability and customization. 

Cost Comparison

Using EquipmentWatch’s Internal Charge Rate Calculator, contractors can analyze the costs associated with both owning and renting specific models of equipment. For example, a contractor considering the purchase of a new excavator might find that the ownership costs—factoring in depreciation, maintenance, insurance, and fuel—amount to $4,000 per month. In contrast, renting the same excavator for occasional use might cost $3,500 per month. However, if the equipment is used often, the rental costs could eventually surpass the ownership costs. 

An example of a Case Study: The Real Cost of Owning a Fleet 

Let’s take a closer look at a case study involving a medium-sized construction company that owns a fleet of heavy equipment. The company, which we’ll call “BuildRight Construction,” owns a fleet of 20 pieces of equipment, including bulldozers, excavators, and backhoes. 

Fleet Overview:

  • Total initial investment: $5 million. 
  • Annual maintenance and repair costs: $300,000. 
  • Annual insurance costs: $100,000. 
  • Depreciation (over 5 years): $2 million. 

Annual Ownership Costs:

  • Depreciation: $400,000 per year. 
  • Maintenance and repairs: $300,000 per year. 
  • Insurance: $100,000 per year. 
  • Storage and transportation: $50,000 per year. 

Total Annual Costs: $850,000. 

Over the course of five years, BuildRight Construction will have spent $4.25 million in ownership costs alone, not including the initial investment. If the company had chosen to rent instead, it might have paid slightly more monthly but avoided the significant depreciation costs and the burden of managing and keeping the fleet. 

construction machines on neu motorway in Germany

Why Data-Driven Decisions Are Essential

In an industry where margins are often thin, making informed decisions about equipment investments is crucial. EquipmentWatch provides contractors with the tools and data they need to evaluate the true costs of ownership and make smart, strategic choices. 

Leveraging EquipmentWatch Tools: 

  • Internal Charge Rate Calculator: This tool helps contractors calculate the cost of owning and operating equipment, factoring in variables such as buying price, depreciation, maintenance, and fuel costs. It allows users to compare these costs against rental rates to decide the most cost-effective option. 
  • Retail Rental Rate: Provides correct rental rates for equipment, helping contractors assess whether renting might be more financially practical than buying. 
  • Desktop Valuation: Offers up-to-date valuations of equipment, ensuring that contractors have correct data for resale and tax purposes. 

The Role of Market Conditions in Equipment Decisions

Market conditions play a significant role in deciding whether it’s better to own or rent equipment. During periods of high demand, rental rates can increase, making ownership more attractive. Conversely, during economic downturns, rental rates may decrease, providing a more cost-effective solution. 

According to EquipmentWatch’s latest market reports, the construction industry is facing a potential slowdown in 2024, with nonresidential construction spending projected to grow at a slower rate than in previous years.³ This trend could lead to a decrease in equipment demand, potentially lowering rental rates and making renting a more attractive option for contractors looking to conserve capital.

Regional Differences

Market conditions can also vary by region. For example, rental rates in urban areas with high construction activity may be significantly higher than in rural areas. Contractors should consider these regional differences when deciding whether to rent or own equipment. 

As we know from the experience of the last few years, the value of equipment can range widely depending on a wide variety of factors. To stay ahead, contractors must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of equipment ownership versus renting. While owning equipment offers certain advantages, it also comes with hidden costs that can erode profitability. On the other hand, renting provides flexibility and reduces the financial burden of maintenance and depreciation, but it may not be the most cost-effective choice for frequent use. 

By using data-driven tools like those provided by EquipmentWatch, contractors can make informed decisions that align with their business goals. Whether you choose to own, rent, or adopt a hybrid approach, understanding the true costs associated with each option will help you maximize your equipment investments and ensure long-term success in a competitive market. 

hero-image-copy